All that's needed to prove extensive AUSTRALIAN taxpayer funded TERRORISM is in the 7 links above.

Latin maxim “Quando aliquid prohibetur ex directo, prohibetur et per obliquum” means when something is prohibited directly, its prohibited indirectly.  Except in Australia where government public officers are largest organised crime network, they believe they're personally and individually above the law. Anticipating a long political career, parliamentarians became their unconstitutional accomplices in crime against Commonwealth enabling other public officers to cross the line from political policy into terrorism. Despite the illegality of their actions general news media silently support their government's terrorism in alleged democracies. That's something every person should be concerned about else one day we'll all be exactly like North Korea.   I don't mean ruled by man with bad haircut.

unplug from the Matrix





Evidence suggests the 2 Leanne's published in Sydney press in Sep 1984 (left and right) are twisted sisters and became the authors (above) of the book about the murders. What better place to hide than under everyone's nose? Their extended national family of government public officers stole public resources to physically brutalise and destroyed the lives of Janette and her family, so they could pull of their brazen confidence trick for 30 something years and still counting.

THIS WEBSITE REQUIRES LARGE MONITOR - NOT SUITABLE FOR MOBILE PHONE VIEWING.                                    Definition of a Australian terrorist activity defined here.

2007 Adelaide AUSTRALIA: Labor Party controlled State government public officers criminally assaulted Janette then charged her with assaulting them; refused her access to medical services to treat her extensive injuries that are now permanent; refused her access to court services to redress assault etc under tort law as they falsified a mental health on her using fabricated and irrelevant data; then secreted that false mental health record for 11 years until a political change of government occurred in 2018.

21 March 2007 Janette approached reception counter staff at Ashford private hospital (co-owned with Flinders hospital) seeking outpatients services od neurologist to suit referral due to intermittent and total numbness in both hands. Janette has a brief conversation with Dr Shane Goodyear in which she noted that Benson Radiology, (next door to Ashford hospital) had not reported the huge infection in her head as seen in MRI on 5 May 2006. GOODYEAR threatened Janette, so she left. As she was walking out the front door with her adult son the pair were jumped from behind and thrown to the ground receiving several open wounds. The pair were pinned to the floor of the foyer by 7, (seven) unidentified Ashford hospital personnel as GOODYEAR grabbed a hypodermic needle full of a drug and injected it into Janette’s leg. The state refused to tell Janette the grounds for her criminal assault instead claimed it a legal Mental Health Act Detention Order, but refused to provide Janette with copy of the alleged Detention Order which is mandatory under the Act.


2 May 2007 John Hill’s Christies Beach police criminally assaulted Janette and her daughter in a similar manner.


2012 - 5, (five) years later the State decided to give Janette copy of the 2007 Detention Order, but they did it in a civil court setting and claimed it was true evidence despite that Janette was not given a chance to reply the court dismissed Janette’s application falsely claiming the 2007 Detention Order was factual. GOODYEAR had criminally falsified his Detention Order falsely claiming Janette assaulted Ashford hospital staff and threatened to shoot (unnamed person) with a gun. The pivotal evidence to affirm the events were an unlawful conspiracy rests on the fact that police failed to question Janette about GOODYEAR’s “assault and shoot with a gun” claims.


2014 at State election time Janette was assaulted with several more illegal Detention Orders.

2018 at State election time they tried it on again. Since 2007 dozens of state owned documents about Janette have been criminally falsified and tucked away in their mental health record secreted from Janette and shared amongst Adelaide public officer like 'twas a porno flick.

The grounds? 'Dunno' you'll have to ask John David Hill.

LEFT: Undated, unsigned letter numbered '57' and '58' addressed to Glenside Risk Manager.


Your work associates will know who you are. The full facts and extensive documentation of Janette’s private affairs collated in a politically fabricated and irrelevant government file number 'UR 173586' inferenced as  'mental health record' proves this public officer and her/his associates had NO LEGAL EXCUSE to be stalking me, therefore they stole government resources to accomplish her/his private political or religious goals.


Under the circumstances every comment or accusation was/is none of the anonymous writer’s business, it does however prove the very long (time) and vexatious false slur campaign has intentionally been launched by government public officers with express intent to harm Janette.


As its already been 12 years and all this is brand new to Janette she has legal right of public reply.


Point 3 FALSE; council claimed the car was abandoned when legally parked out front of Janette's residence; only ones complaining were government public officers, only ones offended by it were/are government public officers who were/are party to the criminal conduct Janette was exposing, proved when police refused to investigate the extensive damage to Janette’s car when she saw two 50+ adult males in NSW registered black custom Ute smash 3 windows with a huge sandstone rock from adjacent park. Local police didn't even snap photos of the extensive damage that was fully paid under insurance claim as they didn't bother to come and have a look.


Point 5 FALSE; under informal contract.


Point 6 FALSE; understandably scared of aggressive psychopaths threatening their mum without legal excuse.


Unpointed between 6 and 7 FALSE; Admission of invasion of privacy (thanks); FALSE not detained at RAH, criminally and illegally detained at Ashford hospital, released by RAH.


Point 7 FALSE; refer to your own words in your point 1.


Point 8 FALSE; landlord admitted Janette had continuing lease, Janette was illegally evicted from private rental by government public officers; wasn't electrocuted at all.


Point 10 FALSE; that sounds like jealously.


Point 12 FALSE; you’re entitled to your opinion however; you will be required to justify ‘legal excuse’ to write this mostly false and defamatory document.


Point 13 FALSE; delusions are not based on fact, facts are NSW and SA police have illegally refused to investigate and charge every person whose criminally assaulted or threatened Janette since 1959, including you and police themselves; Janette has always loved ex-husband, was the ex-defacto who stole her real estate. Repeating any lie you couldn’t care less (reckless) is false, is still criminal defamation s257 Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA.)


Point 14 FALSE; proves you’re a psychopath the ear pus and blood were real (documented by specialist); the hand is dislocated (state records falsely claimed it broken); the foot nerves are dead (as documented in NSW by neurologist.)


Janette will find out your name as it's needed for the restraining order to identify you and every one of the other ex-public officer psychopaths Janette clearly needs protection from.