I say this to Georgina Ai-Chin CHENG & her bipartisan narcissist Communist comrades named or inferred in this website: If you don’t like multicultural Australia where all can freely speak up against Communist practices of public officers like you; sue government & have proper diagnosis of illegal implants without automatically being diagnosed with mental illness as YOU DID TO ME then FUKOFF to Nth KOREA RUSSIA or CHINA UR not wanted here Arsewipes.



If they act Communist, they are Communist

1) 2:38 pm is time stamp on the audio recording at Janette's front door.

2) 2:42 pm Communist CHENG timed her signed Mental Health Act order, being four minutes after she was told to get off Janette's property.

3) About an hour later Communist CHENG admits twice in the presence of 2 police that she was NOT able to “assess” Janette for detention under mental health law but detained her under the Mental Health Act anyway. See videos at left; First Confession and Second Confession.

4) s102 Mental Health Act says Janette's imprisonment is a criminal offence punishable by Maximum penalty: $25 000 or imprisonment for 2 years.

5) Despite all this the State of South Australia relevant senior public officer officials claim they can't see any illegality with Janette's imprisonment.

6) LexisNexis Concise Australian Legal Dictionary 5th Ed; (which is currently recommended dictionary for State University Law Degrees) says on page 479;

POLITICAL OFFENCE  An offence directly and solely related to an organised, prolonged campaign involving a number of people to change government policy or overthrow the domestic political order of a state and its government authority.

Case law: Prevato v Governor, Metropolitan Remand Centre (1986) 8 FCR 358; 64 ALR 37; Colombia v Peru [1950] ICJ Rep 266.



An organisation that is directly or indirectly engaged in preparing, planning, assisting, fostering or advocating a terrorist attack (see Criminal Code Act s100.1)



Criminal Code Act; the Criminal Code Schedule

s100.1 terrorist act means: an action or threat of action where:  the action falls within subsection (2) and does not fall within subsection (3); and the action is done or the threat is made with the intention of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause; and with the intention of: coercing, or influencing by intimidation, the government of the Commonwealth or a State, Territory or intimidating the public or a section of the public.

subsection (2):  Person/s causes serious harm that is physical harm to a person; or endangers a person’s life other than the life of the person taking the action; creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public; or seriously interferes with, seriously disrupts, or destroys, an electronic system including, but not limited to a system used for the delivery of essential government services; or essential public utility or for, or by, a transport system.

subsection (3):  is advocacy, protest, dissent or industrial action; and not intended to cause any harm.


Communism is the ‘corruption’ of democracy. Communism is fully supported by frontline staff at Adelaide’s ICAC who have refused to investigate everything I’ve put before them. It’d be un-Australian NOT to be able to say so freely yet dobbing on ICAC staff for refusing to investigate an obvious Communist act is a breach of South Australian law which means we’re already a Communist State. see s 25—Public statements Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2012 (SA)

CHENG is listed as working at Barrett House, 39 George Street, Norwood, SA 5067 Australia with another psychiatrist named Helen Tingay who like Georgina Cheng is a danger to the general public. CHENG and TINGAY or any other are quite welcome to challenge my claims in a civil court where Australian law rules, not their sadistically psychopathic specialist brand of narcissistic Community Communism - unless, from my personal experience, you've got evident Labor political party supporters deciding your case; Judge Mark Griffin; Judge John Sulan; or Magistrate Alison Frances Adair.

SULAN  in 2006 Adelaide Supreme Civil Court was the last of 3 judicial entities who in Supreme Court Appeal refused to look at my supporting evidence and ordered my residential eviction in 2006, the supreme court Registrar refused to accept my appeal from the Sulan appeal decision, on the grounds I didn't have a street address as I was homeless.

GRIFFIN in 2010 Adelaide District Civil Court refused to accept my Statement of Claim on my 2 May 2007 criminal assault at the hands of Christies Beach police by giving me the ultimatum either I sign a SOC authored by an anonymous person from the Christies Beach office next door to Labor Party’s John David HILL as my own creation or Griffin would toss my case from court. I refused to sign. Griffin tossed my case out.

ADAIR in 2019 Adelaide Magistrates Civil Court refused to acknowledge my national Consumer Law rights under Statute when she refused to hear my application for Summary Judgment even though the defendant failed to show in court and I had ample supporting evidence and defendant had ample time to respond. Adair insisted I must pay more court fees because I hadn’t asked the court for special leave to apply for summary judgment and interlocutory applications for Summary Judgment aren’t accepted in minor court because minor court doesn't have strict application of the Magistrate Court rules. Good luck if you can follow the logic of that.

There is only ONE Australian law and NOWHERE in Australian law does it say a person can be imprisoned for publishing TRUE FACTS, yet that's what Communist Georgina Ai Chin CHENG did with her band of lawless Communist styled State public officers from Noarlunga, Flinders and Adelaide AUSTRALIA after they repeatedly claimed my homelessness was due to mental illness; in their criminally falsified government records they illegally secreted from me (conspiracy to defame).

AUSTRALIAN COMMUNISTS have taken over government in Sydney, Canberra and Adelaide, reinventing Nazism; that's why AUSTRALIA SUX.

At the root of this is child to adult me refusing to remain silent in the face of atrocities against children. You'd be a fool to believe  the churches were the only men involved in man-boy paedophilia last century. As the daughter of a Freemason I witnessed it many times as a child involving prominent government public officers, GPOs today are still covering it up as they scream for justice against the churches. Many people are happy to remain silent in exchange for government favours. You see the hate from Georgina Ai Chin Cheng when she spoke of the Internet to police officer #79819 as if it's a mortal sin, CHENG said, “Apparently, she has a habit of putting things on the Internet.” toward the end of video 'Second Confession' below (2:27m of 4:30m).

News Flash: It's the same in every country across the globe, there's only 3 types of people: those who happily expose the criminal

activities in, (our Labor and Liberal) government; those who are too stupid to see it; those so evil they support it.

At the risk of insulting the majority - there is no 4th option; 'don't care' is either stupid or evil.

Who are you? Happy Stupid or Evil.


This is a true crime story about how state mental health law was criminally used by vexatious, sadistic psychopathic public officers, as a political weapon to ‘TOP DOWN’ circumvent Australian law and the individual's legal rights under statute.

Written by: Janette Gail FRANCIS (by birth) student-at-law HD grade in Defamation Law


December 2013 Adelaide AUSTRALIA:

A group of not too bright public officers in State health department decided they'd teach Janette a lesson for complaining about government conspiracies, so they discussed their conspiracy at length in group emails before Christmas in December 2013. Made their plan on paper on 15 January 2014. Then carried out the plan to the letter on 22 January 2014. Followed by the obligatory government cover-up that blamed their actions on an "order" issued by their boss "the Minister" the political head of their department.

Guess the Einstein’s never considered the probability that Janette might seek evidence of the Ministerial order in a Freedom of Information Act application. Naturally there was nothing to be found from the Minister.

For Communist CHENG's edification: Janette's Scottish-Irish copper brown curly sometimes fuzzy hair is only “dishevelled” to a Communist who adores their own lifeless straight black hair and wants it to be the new 'normal' - bit like brown eyed black haired Hitler and his blonde blue eye obsession.

Janette's personal philosophy is that 95% of government public officers have committed crimes that should put them in prison for a very long time, including the individuals whose documents appear on this page.

Mental Health Act 2009 (SA) Schedule 1

Certain conduct may not indicate mental illness A person does not have a mental illness merely because of any 1 or more of the following:

(a) the person expresses or refuses or fails to express, or has expressed or refused or failed to express, a particular political
opinion or belief

(c) the person expresses or refuses or fails to express, or has expressed or refused or failed to express, a particular philosophy

(e) the person engages in or refuses or fails to engage in, or has engaged in or refused or failed to engage in, a particular political activity

(i) the person engages in or has engaged in illegal conduct

(l) the person engages in or has engaged in anti-social behaviour

(m) the person has a particular economic or social status or is a member of a particular cultural or racial group.



As used originally by the ancient Greeks, the term "philosophy" meant the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake, and comprised ALL areas of speculative thought, including the arts, sciences and religion. Philosophical questions (unlike those of the sciences) are usually foundational and abstract in nature. Philosophy is done primarily through reflection.


It appears from the documents that Andrew CHAMPION, Annette JONES, Georgina Ai Chin CHENG, Belinda MOYES and other inferred Communists decided Janette had a "philosophy" that disagreed with their personal philosophy as if they were followers of a Communist belief based system as loosely defined in following text:


Very broadly speaking, according to some commentators, Western society strives to find and prove "the truth", while Eastern society accepts the truth as given and is more interested in finding the balance. Westerners put more stock in individual rights; Easterners in social responsibility.


The illegality of their conspiracy is expressed in Mental Health Act 2009 (SA), s102 Offences relating to authorisations and orders which says:

s102(1) A medical practitioner or authorised mental health professional who signs any authorisation or order for the purposes of this Act, without having examined the person to whom the authorisation or order relates, is guilty of an offence. Maximum penalty: $25 000 or imprisonment for 2 years. 

s102(5) A person who, by fraudulent means, procures or attempts to procure any person who does not have a mental illness to be received into a treatment centre, or to be treated as a person to whom an order applies under this Act, is guilty of an offence. Maximum penalty: $25 000 or imprisonment for 2 years. 


As it turns out the South Australia Health Department 2014 Criminal Conspiracy includes the CEO of SA Health Belinda Moyes or one of her staff forging her signature had this to say:

"In accordance with the Mental Health Act 2009, you were placed under an Inpatient Treatment Order (ITO) for the purposes of a mental health assessment."

"During this admission you were diagnosed"

"Conspiracy whether civil or criminal traditionally has been defined as agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means A tortious conspiracy accordingly consists in the agreement of two or more persons to cause loss or damage to another by doing an ’unlawful’ act or by doing a lawful act by ’unlawful’ means Professor Howard’ has pointed out that ’as a matter of logic the first of these two categories of conspiracy includes the second. If there is an agreement to do an unlawful act there is a conspiracy. It is immaterial whether the act question is the ultimate object of the agreement or one of the steps along the way to that object. In either case the reason for calling the agreement a conspiracy is that it contemplates the performance of an unlawful act Recent Australian decisions nonetheless have affirmed the existence of two types of civil conspiracy."

Written in 1991

by Ellen Goodman LLM (Syd) BA (Macq)

Barrister, Supreme Court of NSW
Senior Lecturer
Business Law Discipline
Macquade University

1991 Case Law:

Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd & Ors v Australian Federation of Air Pilots & Ors (1989) Aust Torts Reports 80 290.

Conspiracy Offer - Plan - Government Coverup

It’s been almost 6 years since Janette's illegal imprisonment by Communist government officials at election time in 2014. CROWN solicitor refuses to negotiate claiming Janette has no case. She's been forced to start a law degree as NO AUSTRALIAN lawyer will take on her obvious easy-win case. I can hear the recalcitrant faction of Adelaide’s judiciary bleating, "that's for us to decide". Apparently Australia's human rights legislation is just there to keep up appearance at their United Nations table.

"Tyranny is a product of engaged followership predicated on identification with those in authority - whose cause is believed to be right, and that belief is the basis for followership"