It’s not been proofread for grammar because like all Australians, sometimes I couldn’t give a shit really. Which is what all politicians bank on happening all the time.

Australia's ‘2-party preferred’ politicians (ALP & LIBS) don't bother with the Australian Constitution stipulations for referendum to change the effect of our Constitution; they change what they want through unconstitutional enactments of parliament, Acts, (laws) that not only nullify our Constitution, they nullify the Magna Carta and other existing century old Tort Law created to stop sadists just like them from harming citizens, just like us. How many of you know what Tort Law is? You don’t know because the ‘2-party preferred’ villains intended that you don’t know them so they can steal them from you. I was never taught about Tort Law in my Sydney NSW region government schools (1960s-1970s). That’s irrefutable evidence of an unlawful government conspiracy to breach national Australian Consumer Law mandatory service guarantees; because your Tort Law rights are part of your irrevocable government ‘service’ guarantees made enforceable on government the moment they decided to classify themselves with a “corporation” identity complete with an Australian Business Number. Sort of like shooting themselves in the foot - people with the villain gene also have the stupid gene. Its unlawful to deny any Australian their Australian Consumer Law services guarantees - therefore its unlawful to deny any Australian redress from harms to the person as defined in Tort Law and the Australian Constitution. The many writers of the Australian Consumer Law are unsung astute heroes.

Don't sit back to wait for lawyers & soliciting legal whores to make a Constitutional Law challenge of the government for unconstitutional changes in legislation; they’re in the government’s pocket; they’re in the main employed by the government to remain silent on unconstitutional changes. Don’t believe me Google a large legal firm to see who there gives advice to government. If you want to sue government, they call that a ‘conflict of interest’ where their ‘conflict’ is risking future income from government if they sue government on your behalf. They make USA gangster Al Capone look like a baby. They got Capone on tax evasion, we can get our government gangsters on Australian Consumer Law evasion.

Al Capone didn't physically torture anyone for 40 years.

Over time only the names and faces change. Our ‘2-party preferred’ government based gangsters are a cross between life-long police protected surgeon Dr Alfredo Ballí Treviño, (aka Hannibal Lecter in Silence of the Lambs) - and the 60 Roman senators who conspired to murder / murderedHoly Roman Emperor Julius Caesar because the whining babies were jealous of their Caesar - and our recent history psycho freaks, the Nazi party of WWII; who we're informed were 'bankrolled' by a grandfather of a recent USA president, Prescott Bush was a director involved with the financial architects of Nazism, also protected by police in another falsely alleged democracy.

 

Quote from linked story:  "It has also been suggested that the money he made from these (Hitler-Nazi) dealings helped to establish the (USA president) Bush family fortune and set up its political dynasty...  

The murder of about 400,000 Hungarian Holocaust victims could have been prevented...

You can't blame Bush for what his grandfather did any more than you can blame Jack Kennedy for what his father did - bought Nazi stocks - but what is important is the cover-up, how it could have gone on so successfully for half a century, and does that have implications for us today?"

The obvious answer is yes, the current cover-up of my present 24/7 physical torture and multiplicity of medical crimes against me for over 40 years by government officials in Australian-American medical industry testifies to that. Even the Adelaide Supreme Court continues the criminal medical-crime cover-up in 2019, see Janette Gail Francis v Alison Barbara Jane Cole and Gpaxis Pty Ltd [2019] SASC 179 in an act of breach of Federal Constitutional separation of powers and breaching my Federal Australian Consumer Law rights the lower State Civil Court refused to recognise the illegal implant and its 2006 infection seen by you in the header at top of this website page (above).

Just as relevant is fact the Judge relied on 'as evidence' to support defendant COLE a document signed by COLE in which British citizen on Aussie work-visa COLE made a false declaration to Federal government in COLE's medical-legal capacity 16 March 2018, as confirmation of an unlawful conspiracy between State Government Public Officers and COLE at State election time in 2018, but was not directly related to COLE's defamatory statement about my mental health. It was a crime within a crime and Supreme Court Bocky rubber-stamped them both.

"beam me up Scotty" moment

This is a human rights crime equal to those of Nazi Germany, but our State and Federal police remain conspicuously silent and inactive. The only one whose ever been arrested is me, for complaining that my Australian Consumer Law rights have been denied me by government public officers and the medical community in Adelaide Australia, evidently that extends to Muslim medical doctor surgeon and hypnotist Mohamed  Riyazuddin Ahmed (educated in India) practicing in Sydney NSW region; who has self-implicated himself as an architect of my criminal medical rape with microwave active implants (as above) circa 1998, in the 2013-2014 secret COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA medical industry Medicare Australia records proved medical crimes, listed under my name, criminally claiming income from his false insistence he treated me with my informed consent ‘face to face’ and three times from 2013 to 2014 inclusive. 

It’s not that he ‘treated’ me and I refused to acknowledge him, I’ve not consulted with Ahmed at all since I refreshed his memory of me in March 2008 when I was in Campbelltown NSW live-in visiting with my ex-husband who died suddenly 4 months later. Yes, his sudden death at 55 is suspicious in the scheme of things as was the death of my only other partner 2 years later aged 44. What the doctor’s death certificates say is irrelevant under the entirety of our circumstances.

Aside from a videoed signed witnessed confession not involving police, you can't get much better evidence than that. Yet the Australian law enforcement officials are sitting on their hands doinf nothing to protect you from what's already happened to me; despite that I stood my ground and stated clearly their activity was illegal. That's also in this website, on my video when they illegally imprisoned me ion 22 January 2014. My video evidence proving State medical-crimes is referenced by CEO Moyes in her letter to me complaining that I committed a crime against her criminal gang. Same link as the last one page 10 dated 23 April 2014. Moyes should have been charged for aiding medical crimes, but like so many before her in crime central Adelaide, she's roaming free looking for her next victim.

Mind you the same year the '2-party preferred' criminals illegally imprisoned me by fabricating mental health issues 2014, they opened their new AU$3billion brain research unit in Adelaide Australia. South  Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI) yes BRAIN research, you can imaging how legal that'll be they claim to have almost 500 research sponsors. Amazingly the medical-crime supporting Judge has a surname with well known Jewish origins.

Does that mean she's been threatened by our government with medical-crimes to her own family? Or perhaps she's been falsely convinced that I'm someone in her past she detests. Wouldn't be first time someone wanted to throw me under the proverbial bus to save their own skin. Isn't that right Lorraine and Rex John Walters? They're my biggest online fans, stalkers really. They've physically followed me 1500 kilometres from Sydney to Adelaide. That's dedication or psychopathic criminal necessity more to the point. I'm not sure whether to be flattered or annoyed..

These USA protected Nazi financial supporters have been and are Australia's long-term and closest political allies. Should make you think twice about our place in global politics and our political and MEDICAL alliance with the Unites States of America medical research. Especially as USA university is where some of the illegal implants originate from that Australia's governments illegally forced inside me and forcibly ensure they remain inside me. I refer to the little publish BION you can see glowing in my foot on another page of this website. They're spotted throughout me.

 

While the rest of you are sleeping or wallowing in your own self-importance not giving a shit about powerless Australians physically suffering 'right now' and your children's future and many future generations who will all physically suffer because you're bone lazy, politically asleep; and have been bribed or brainwashed by personal wealth so you won't care about the ‘2-party preferred’ villains in both sides of Australian politics ‘right now’ - that’s LABOR and LIBERAL both have been stealing our centuries old legal rights by creeping up slowly behind us so we won’t notice the scumbags in action. Stealing our legal rights that had been gained by bloodshed of our ancestors, yours and mine. We won’t and can't get them back without vocal opposition from you.

Australia’s Constitution “2-party preferred” political system has been adopted literally as our legal system, where if you’re not a preferred member of either major political party, you’re not protected by Australian law. Its apartheid Australian style. Its proved 100% by the fact that GPOs and medical doctors are “allowed” to viciously assault me, illegally trespass on my property and steal my possessions, without legal excuse, but if I were to do the same to them I’d be arrested and imprisoned.

They’ve charged and imprisoned and penalised me for breaching laws they “invented” that aren’t part of recognised Australian law and don’t apply to anyone else that I know. That's what started me looking for my ancestors to see if there is a racial motive. But even my Irish ex-medical doctor has treated me in the Australian apartheid manner, so I'm still baffled as to the motive for all the hatred levelled at me by psychopathic GPOs and medical doctors. The only basis could be their secreted apartheid theme based on a predisposition to participate in serious organsied crime for the benefit of the 2-party preferred 'system'. You may have noticed I push the "Freemason sex crime" theme, but there's a distinct possibility its because I spoke out very publicly and very often against the unconstitutional changes by politicians in the 1980s.

 

Despite what any Government Public Officers (GPOs) may insist - all Australian law is based on one document, the national Australian Constitution, without exception whatsoever.

Australian GPOs have historically gone out of their way to distance people not in favour with 2 party preferred political parties from their legal rights. One method they use is contradiction of information dispensed by GPOs as official legal information.

One of my grievances is that the gov’ts actively deny Australians not in favour with the gov’t 2 party preferred political parties, their legal right to “access to justice” by hiring potentially all lawyers across Australia to give legal advice to the gov’t; despite that they have their own legal teams employed as GPOs expressly to provide legal advice to gov’t (State Crown Solicitor’s office; and federal Gov’t Solicitor General)

The gov’ts unconstitutionally employ private lawyers experienced in gov’t matters so they these “private” lawyers can claim a “conflict of financial interest” when you approach them to sue to gov’t. Now I suspect you can see how and why that is a premeditated decision to maintain criminal activity on all Australian gov’ts. It’s not only unconstitutional, it’s also very impressive evidence to prove the existence of serious organised crime in the gov’ts of Australia. The only place GPOs want you to complain to is themselves and we all know how that works. There is no reference to the Constitution when the gov’ts want to act like two-bit criminals, which is 24/7.

 

According to current national gov’t our national Australian gov’t isn’t the Commonwealth of Australia anymore as it had been since Federation of the States of Australia in 1901 or 1902 I’m not sure as the data is contradictory.

Our national identity is to the rest of the world is just “Commonwealth” or “Australia.” GPOs first made that distinction unconstitutionally in 1980s when they unconstitutionally removed and the words “Commonwealth of Australia” (circa 1983) from all our paper notes (now polymer) replacing those words with simply “Australia.”

Then circa 1988 GPOs lead by Liberals “little” Johnny Howard removed the Privy Court in England as the final court of appeal for Australians, leaving us with just the High Court. Which means Australian gov’t gets to decide if they’ve acted unconstitutionally not the ones who set up the Constitution, the English gov’t now known as the United Kingdom. It’s the same as the police investigating their own crimes. It doesn’t always work as it should as the decisions are a privilege bestowed on us depending on our individual popularity with GPO taking on our case decision, not our right.

There was no referendum to change Australia from Commonwealth of Australia to Australia.

It’s not been proofread for grammar because like all Australians, sometimes I couldn’t give a shit really. Which is what all politicians bank on happening all of the time.

Australia’s Constitution “2 party preferred” political system has been adopted literally as our legal system, where if you’re not a preferred member of either major political party, you’re not protected by Australian law. Its apartheid Australian style. Its proved 100% by the fact that GPOs and medical doctors are “allowed” to viciously assault me, illegally trespass on my property and steal my possessions, without legal excuse, but if I were to do the same to them I’d be arrested and imprisoned.

They’ve charged and imprisoned and penalised me for breaching laws they “invented” that aren’t part of recognised Australian law and don’t apply to anyone else that I know. That's what started me looking for my ancestors to see if there is a racial motive. But even my Irish ex-medical doctor has treated me in the Australian apartheid manner, so I'm still baffled as to the motive for all the hatred levelled at me by psychopathic GPOs and medical doctors. The only basis could be their secreted apartheid theme based on a predisposition to participate in serious organsied crime for the benefit of the 2 party preferred 'system'. You may have noticed I push the "Freemason sex crime" theme, but there's a distinct possibility its because I spoke out very publicly and very often against the unconstitutional changes by politicians in the 1980s.

Despite what any Government Public Officers (GPOs) may insist - all Australian law is based on one document, the national Australian Constitution, without exception whatsoever.

Australian GPOs have historically gone out of their way to distance people not in favour with 2 party preferred political parties from their legal rights. One method they use is contradiction of information dispensed by GPOs as official legal information.

One of my grievances is that the gov’ts actively deny Australians not in favour with the gov’t 2 party preferred political parties, their legal right to “access to justice” by hiring potentially all lawyers across Australia to give legal advice to the gov’t; despite that they have their own legal teams employed as GPOs expressly to provide legal advice to gov’t (State Crown Solicitor’s office; and federal Gov’t Solicitor General)

The gov’ts unconstitutionally employ private lawyers experienced in gov’t matters so they these “private” lawyers can claim a “conflict of financial interest” when you approach them to sue to gov’t. Now I suspect you can see how and why that is a premeditated decision to maintain criminal activity on all Australian gov’ts. It’s not only unconstitutional, it’s also very impressive evidence to prove the existence of serious organised crime in the gov’ts of Australia. The only place GPOs want you to complain to is themselves and we all know how that works. There is no reference to the Constitution when the gov’ts want to act like two-bit criminals, which is 24/7.

According to current national gov’t our national Australian gov’t isn’t the Commonwealth of Australia anymore as it had been since Federation of the States of Australia in 1901 or 1902 I’m not sure as the data is contradictory.

Our national identity is to the rest of the world is just “Commonwealth” or “Australia.” GPOs first made that distinction unconstitutionally in 1980s when they unconstitutionally removed and the words “Commonwealth of Australia” (circa 1983) from all our paper notes (now polymer) replacing those words with simply “Australia.”

Then circa 1988 GPOs lead by Liberals “little” Johnny Howard removed the Privy Court in England as the final court of appeal for Australians, leaving us with just the High Court. Which means Australian gov’t gets to decide if they’ve acted unconstitutionally not the ones who set up the Constitution, the English gov’t now known as the United Kingdom. It’s the same as the police investigating their own crimes. It doesn’t always work as it should as the decisions are a privilege bestowed on us depending on our individual popularity with GPO taking on our case decision, not our right.

There was no referendum to change Australia from Commonwealth of Australia to Australia.

There was no referendum to remove the Privy Court as Australia's last court of appeal to the decisions of the Australian High Court in Australia which was the second last court of appeal under the Constitution. I suspect that as a lot of the High Court’s decisions were being overturned by the Privvy Court, they decided to take their ball and go home, as it were.

So that Australia’s High Court is now officially the last court of appeal it’s an unconstitutional or illegal or criminal official stance taken by Australian GPOs in breach of Australian law which is based on and only on the Constitution of Australia.The Australian Constitution can only be changed with a majority approval of Australian citizens. That's a majority of people in the majority of states, So how did the Privy Court get removed and Australia be re-designated out of the Commonwealth? The answer its a farce - its unconstitutional - its illegal - its void.

 

 

It’s also an unconstitutionally bipartisan decision, which means illegally supported by both the Liberal and Labor parties in our bipartisan, 2 party preferred system of gov’t under the national Federal Constitution.

According to “the Commonwealth” or “Australia” or “Commonwealth of Australia” I’m really not sure who we ‘legally’ are any more, anyway the federal gov’t say the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia or the Constitution of Australia has 5 Constitutional Writs, one more than the State.

According to current national gov’t GPOs, we’re granted Constitutional Writs via section 75(v) of the national Constitution but whether a legislated Writ is a Constitutional Writ is still unclear. I suspect not.

The High Court refers us to sections 30 to 33 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) for further reference on the Australian Constitution’s Writs, with the inference that the legislations can change the constitution as the Australia Act (Cth) did, but they can’t - if GPOs claim they have its unconstitutional which means its illegal.

The High Court tells us in their advertising material that our national Constitutional Writs are:

  1. Certiorari
  2. Habeas corpus
  3. Mandamus
  4. Prohibition
  5. Quo warranto.

According to my current residential State’s GPOs at the South Australian State gov’t there are only 4 Constitutional Writs available if the State court system. GPOs call access to these a ‘Judicial Review’ made at State level; they have 2 others they just classify as ‘Remedies’ which is what a Constitutional Writ are really, a remedy. In fact every decision in a court system is meant to be a remedy but often it’s just an illegal block on your rights and a remedy for the gov’t to officially deny you your rights so they continue to get their own way, despite the Constitution of Australia.

In the State advertising material GPOs tell us we don’t have Constitutional Writs under State law, they call them “Remedies” and these remedies are granted to us automatically even before Federation under “Common Law” but the State claims they are granted under a special class of State granted rights called “Judicial REVIEW proceedings and are “Prerogative” which means they are a privilege granted to those in favour with the gov’t not a right available to all of us. You won’t therefore really know if you’re in favour with the gov’t because that depends of the Judicial GPO who takes on your hearing. Despite federal or national Australian Consumer Law that had mandatory Service Guarantees” as advertised by the national gov’t you’re not automatically guaranteed fair and unbiased decisions in State Court system, that’s the prerogative of the individual judicial officer. Which is a ‘crock of shit”.

State privilege “Prerogative” Writs are:

  1. Certiorari
  2. Mandamus
  3. Prohibition
  4. Quo warranto

Equitable remedies potentially available are:

  1. Declaration
  2. Injunction.

Source:

https://lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch09s01s05s03.php

High Court of Australia and various other gov't websites.

AUSTRALIAN LAW

Some crimes are so universally immoral they shouldn’t require a precedence Nuremburg trial.

Please see the above attached links.

 

It’s an age-old story; men in power sadistically abuse the powerless to fund political support from their wealthy mates. Used to be Kings and Queens of England, now its Australia's Liberal and Labor party 2-party preferred political party crime syndicate.

Please see the above attached links. Apart from them being my fellow Australians, I have no relationship to the people in either news item. Apart from them being my fellow Australians, I have no personal relationship to people in either news item.

Remember the movie quote. "somebody whose bored is asleep and somebody whose asleep won't say no."

AUSTRALIAN POLITICIANS

I’ve often wondered why people born in another country in modern times get preference for party selection as candidates. I myself stood for party endorsement for the Labor party in 1990s. Australians know Australia better, right?

Totally unselfish intelligent free thinking me was given the cold shoulder at branch level despite my nationality by birth as my long history of Australian born ‘white’ Australians. This is not having a go at non-white people or immigrants. Most of my ancestors were not born in Australia and many had less than white skin. We all know some people, immigrants or not are predisposed to criminal activities or strict party policy that isn’t often in the best interests of all Australians.

If you’re not born in Australia there’s a huge chance you won’t give a shit about the damage your political or employment decisions cause; if you stuff it up you can always go back 'home' like so many have. Isn't that right ex-NSW police commissioner Peter Ryan.

I overheard 2 strong accent English people talking on Adelaide tram about an Australian elected politician born in England being, "one of us" that's how everyone in the real-world thinks. Its us and them. If you're Australian in Australian you're a "them" to our very wealthy extremly overpaid politicians who know full well how hard it is for many Austrtalians living near the poverty line. They couldn't care less even if they took a short course in sadism at their local TAFE, I'm sure ther's one, there's so many of them in Australia. Sadists that is.

Every person who claims to "love Australia" or "Australia is the best country in the world" it’s for what they know they can get out of Australia.

Frankly apart from the geography, what's to love?

Clearly politicians don't even think being Australian is worth anything because if you're an Australian resident in Australia you have to "compete" with the rest of the world for jobs; for housing v investment properties; private rental; government rental; for a place at university; a spot in politics if that floats your boat; for a place in that sport team of your dreams; even for baby formula for your new born Australian.

Only those who 'know' someone get a job. Seriously who gets a job without a reference? I haven't been able to for the past 30+ years.

If you have a job it’s probably only part-time and therefore your income in shit; unless you 'know' someone who got you a full-time job, or your parent’s knew someone and they were able to afford an expensive private school for you to give you the ‘edge’ over public school students in the job market; and your government subsidises that private school taking money away from public schools in low income areas because politicians want to keep wealthy people happy for more votes at election time. Statistically there's less numbers of the unemployed than there are wealthy workers.

If you don't have a well-paid job you can't afford to pay the vet bills for your 'companion' animal. Seriously how may wealthy people 'need' a companion animal?

If you're on a limited income politicians bank on you not being able to afford the costs of having a car so you'll support their public transport system to subsidise workers cheap travel; sometimes can’t even afford the cost of public transport; unless you forego all else.

Low income people can only get ''third world' health care; I'm the prime example of that. If you need to live in residential care the government pay people to physically and psychologically abuse you presumably so you die sooner rather than later to save overheads for the government.

The ‘health care’ (oxymoron alert) criminals who abuse resident / patients are never penalised by government so long as they make sure they breach criminal law and refuse to keep proper records. If you don't 'know' someone in the police they'll never investigate any crime that causes you “serious aggravated assault” or property damage etc; my experience.

So, the only people who know Australia is a great place are the ones who are rorting the system; are mentally deficient and clueless about the world around them; or have a healthy income they acquired by ‘knowing’ someone. The “I got it by hard work” story is absolute bullshit; my experience in the ‘real’ world.

I say most politicians are only there for the long-term life-long pension. The “how high do you want me to jump” people incapable of free thought are on the evidence, the ones selected to represent the party machine in the 2 party preferred political parties to be just another submissive controlled ‘ant’ in the colony doing the unconstitutional bidding of The party.

Do we not remember how quick Australia’s first female Prime Minister was given the flick by the Labor machine? I don't know for sure, but chances are Julia Gillard was being used as a steppingstone. That's how the Labor party machine rolls, from my personal experience.

I was outed by Senator Peter Primrose and his Camden Branch in 1990s because I had a go at Kym Beasley for lying about an employment proposal that the party machine cooked up as election fodder; it was premeditated harming of young Australians.

I left the Labor Party couple of years later when ALP members including Michael Banasik at Picton-Bargo branch threatened me with expulsion if I didn't vote a particular way at a council development application meeting, when I was an elected Alderman/Councillor on Wollondilly Shire Council 1996-1999

 

 

CITIZEN INITIATED REFERENDUM

Since at least 2013 there's been a Bill (proposed law) for an Act (law) to enable the citizens of Australia to initiate legislation for the holding of a referendum in relation to altering the Constitution, and for related purposes.

If you're still awake you might be interested in the below which is NOT a registered political party the one with the same name is not the same organisation. I suspect the registered one ripped off Mike's group's name, that what registered political parties do best isn't it.

My opinions are not necessarily Mike Holt's opinions and verse visa.

Mike Holt is Founder of Mike Holt's Advance Australia HQ

https://advance-australia.com.au

Mike Holt Advance Australia Twitter Account:

@AdvanceAusHQ

Mike Holt Advance Australia websites:

https://advance-australia.com.au

http://www.cirnow.com.au

https://mywillaustralia.com

Mike Holt Advance Australia Facebook Pages:

@cirnowaustralia

@advanceaustraliahq

Mike Holt Advance Australia Podcasts:

https://www.australianpatriotradio.com

https://www.thebloodyaussiebattler.com

 

News Flash: It's the same in every country across the globe, there's only 3 types of people: those who happily expose the criminal

activities in, (our Labor and Liberal) government; those who are too stupid to see it; those so evil they support it. At the risk of insulting the majority - there is no 4th option; 'don't care' is either stupid or evil. Who are you? Happy Stupid or Evil.

Evil South AUSTRALIA Health opposition spokesperson Chris Pictom MP & Bruce Thomas Lander QC both think you're stupid.