"Australia inspired the world on votes for women" then the Communists crept in
and took over as we basked in the over-confidence of our single victory.
Government Sponsored Medical Crime: CONFIRMED
CONSPIRACY TO MURDER
ABOVE MRI: same NOT reported illegal implant at Janette's left ear as seen in Adelaide MRI radiology; on left without infection in 2012 - on right with infection in 2006.
ABOVE LEFT: The 2013 'legal letter' to Minister for health that State psychiatrists (criminally negligently) claimed that proved Janette had serious mental illness requiring her urgent forced detention under armed guard (mental health prison) almost 4 months later to force drug her with psychotropics under potential threat of electric shocks to her brain (under mental health Act) and a severe beating if she refused. This went on for several months in a capitol city of Communist AUSTRALIA.
LEFT: How State public officers email planned (unlawfully conspired) in December 2013 to illegally imprison Janette as they did on 22 Jan 2014 and the 'letter to the Minister' (health) they say proves Janette is mentally ill; or as Communist CHENG put it "we think you're unwell"
“We have came here on the minister's behalf because we feel that you might be unwell.” and “So I can’t assess her if she’s ordered me off her property and refused to talk to me, can I? So, I’ve detained her, she’s going to hospital, she will be reviewed by another psychiatrist tomorrow.”
BELOW THIS TEXT: Australia records PROVING 100% BEYOND any doubt whatsoever that Adelaide SA and NSW State Health Departments had CRIMINALLY conspired with Adelaide's Health SA public officer Andrew Robert CHAMPION to illegally imprison Janette in Dec 2013 and completed the criminal deed on 22 January 2014 with Georgina Ai-Chin CHENG in concert Mohamed Riyazuddin AHMED from Campbelltown NSW. CHENG and AHMED are masters at hypnotherapy as well as brazen medical criminals.
GOTYA! you lowlife pack of parasitic medical criminals
hope you die in prison.
You'll also note the Marion Domain doctors in Oaklands Park (Adelaide SA) sent their pathology to a company whose registered in Sydney NSW (pathologist named "COTTOM" with an “M”) which puts a high probability of the prior research that told me Marion Domain are owned by NSW persons/entity and linked to NSW State government, in same way that radiologist Professor Michael Radford SAGE worked at the Adelaide State Repatriation Hospital and at Marion Domain Medical Centre radiology unit where he falsified Janette’s diagnostic report at BOTH locations. He was the first to falsify the radoplogy report on her thumb to claim it wasn’t dislocated but he refused to give Janette the Medicare funded film and report then destroyed the film (evidence). Michael Radford SAGE was the first radiologist Janette consulted after she was struck with strong current inside her house in Christies Beach on 17 November 2005, going by his subsequent track record he probably criminally falsified that report too with the same blonde female assistant each 3 times, she called herself “Dale” perhaps the SAGE name is like a writers pen name. Not very wise.
Instead of investigating Janette’s complaints about Adelaide medical doctors refusing to identify NSW medical crimes, Adelaide's State and Federal government public officers maliciously & criminally fabricated a history of mental illness on Janette as if she has no legal rights, proving on balance of probability that illegal medical experiment implants inside Janette ARE All Australian government sponsored medical crimes.
It’s been almost 6 years since Janette's illegal imprisonment by Communist government officials at election time in 2014. CROWN solicitor refuses to negotiate claiming Janette has no case. She's been forced to start a law degree as NO AUSTRALIAN lawyer will take on her obvious easy-win case. I can hear the recalcitrant faction of Adelaide’s judiciary bleating, "that's for us to decide". Apparently, Australia's human rights legislation is just there to keep up appearance at their United Nations table.
If it’s easier for your simple mind to comprehend you can think of me as the logical twin of over emotional Jesus of Nazareth; I’d be the one saying, “Don’t let the bustards off, they know full well what they’re doing, if I’ve told them once I’ve told them 100 times.” Access to inbuilt protections of democratic Australia's laws are not based on Adelaide's Criminally Communist Government's popularity test. Remarkably these mental retards were born for prison. If you can't see that there's a problem with Communism in your department then you ARE the problem.
Tort of Trespass to the Person Terrosist act
Janette submits that if her State government refuse to acknowledge this as an offence against the Commonwealth a "terrorist act" by an unincorporated organisation of individuals; then they themselves become part of a criminal organisation as advocates of Communist terrorism.
There is only one law in Australia. So State government public officers in Adelaide need to resist their automatic reaction of denial, step back, think logically and carefully before they take any physical action faking grounds under the Mental Health Act or any other violent legislation; and weed out terrorist "advocates" of communism in State public office because "if you knock down all the tall pollies all you have left are the weeds."
Above all else Janette is a citizen of democratic Australia, without protections for all inhabitants under democratic laws there is no safe Australia for your family.
Janette submits that the opposite to our advertised “Democratic government” is a “Communist dictatorship” Australia and her allies have sacrificed Janette’s family members and many other brave or innocent lives in the advertised quest to protect us from Communism. What CHENG and her accomplices who planned Janette’s kidnap and imprisonment did on 22 January 2014 is clearly defined in federal Australian law as a criminal "terrorist act" on which Janette has the legal right under Common Law to assert as a Tort of ‘Trespass to the Person Terrorist act’ where:
In reference to The Criminal Code’s definitions of a “terrorist act” and terrorist "advocate”, these terrorist "advocates" acted without authorisation of any Australian law whatsoever.
Their intentional actions, while faking lawful representation of our Democratic State government, was to positively undermine State government Democratic policy by illegally asserting their own Communist policy, denying Janette her legal right to the inbuilt parliamentary protections of the Mental Health Act in s102 Offences relating to authorisations and orders’; and ‘Schedule 1 Certain conduct may not indicate mental illness’.
Therefore, on 22 January 2014, CHENG and her criminal accomplices were "intimidating the public or a section of the public" (being Janette and her witnesses and others in Health SA knowing police were involved in this armed criminal kidnap; with CHENG and her comrades) "caused serious harm that is physical harm" (to Janette) “and endangered (Janette's) life" and "created a serious risk to the health or safety of (Janette as) a section of the public".
Then that's the federal government's statutory definition of a "terrorist act" where Health SA public officers intentionally falsified a mental health history on Janette with an obvious long-term goal to imprison Janette to prevent her from discovering the identity of persons responsible for her 1997 criminal assaults in NSW that left behind inside Janette a number of items also clearly defined by federal government as Active Implantable Medical Devices, designated “high risk” to life by infection death of the host.
The long-term effect of having illegal rapidly vibrating electronic or electric sparking burning implants inside her, is in itself a “serious risk to the health or safety of (Janette as) a section of the public” therefore also capable of being defined as a “terrorist act” in the 1995 legislation and a Common Law Trespass Tort.
Source: Mental Health Act 2009 (SA)
REcard titled 'Communist Nazis' below: "public Nuisance” isn't a crime as stated by Communist MOIR in her s257—Criminal defamation "false document" which was however a double a crime pursuant to s140—Dishonest dealings with documents Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA). 2-dog Bitch.
yes the website name's wrong (below) became a copy-paste error & proves I'm human after all,
couldn't be bothered to change it, we all should know there's a dot after the 3rd 'w' not a dash.
Make no mistake, "corruption" in relation to Democratic government is another word for "Communism"
your “belief” system is another word for your personal “philosophy” these State government funded proved
"lawless mental health teams" are a front for "Communism in Australian government"
"tortfeasor" means a "recalcitrant prick" and
"tortious act" means "lawless things recalcitrant pricks do best".
And, this is the malicious vexatious political crap your Australian governments spend taxpayer dollars on:
COMMUNISM by STEALTH
If they act Communist, they are Communist
1) 2:38 pm is time stamp on the audio recording at Janette's front door.
2) 2:42 pm Communist CHENG timed her signed Mental Health Act order, being four minutes after she was told to get off Janette's property.
3) About an hour later Communist CHENG admits twice in the presence of 2 police that she was NOT able to “assess” Janette for detention under mental health law but detained her under the Mental Health Act anyway. See Youtube.com videos at left; First Confession and Second Confession.
4) s102 Mental Health Act says Janette's imprisonment is a criminal offence punishable by Maximum penalty: $25 000 or imprisonment for 2 years.
5) Despite all this the State of South Australia relevant senior public officer officials claim they can't see any illegality with Janette's imprisonment.
6) LexisNexis Concise Australian Legal Dictionary 5th Ed; (which is currently recommended dictionary for State University Law Degrees) says on page 479;
POLITICAL OFFENCE An offence directly and solely related to an organised, prolonged campaign involving a number of people to change government policy or overthrow the domestic political order of a state and its government authority.
Case law: Prevato v Governor, Metropolitan Remand Centre (1986) 8 FCR 358; 64 ALR 37; Colombia v Peru  ICJ Rep 266.
TERRORIST ORGANISATION in AUSTRALIA:
An organisation that is directly or indirectly engaged in preparing, planning, assisting, fostering or advocating a terrorist attack (see Criminal Code Act s100.1)
TERRORIST ACT in AUSTRALIA:
s100.1 terrorist act means: an action or threat of action where: the action falls within subsection (2) and does not fall within subsection (3); and the action is done or the threat is made with the intention of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause; and with the intention of: coercing, or influencing by intimidation, the government of the Commonwealth or a State, Territory or intimidating the public or a section of the public.
subsection (2): Person/s causes serious harm that is physical harm to a person; or endangers a person’s life other than the life of the person taking the action; creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public; or seriously interferes with, seriously disrupts, or destroys, an electronic system including, but not limited to a system used for the delivery of essential government services; or essential public utility or for, or by, a transport system.
subsection (3): is advocacy, protest, dissent or industrial action; and not intended to cause any harm.
Communism is the ‘corruption’ of democracy. Communism is fully supported by frontline staff at Adelaide’s ICAC who have refused to investigate everything I’ve put before them. It’d be un-Australian NOT to be able to say so freely yet dobbing on ICAC staff for refusing to investigate an obvious Communist act is a breach of South Australian law which means we’re already a Communist State. see s 25—Public statements Independent Commissioner Against Corruption Act 2012 (SA)
CHENG is listed as working at Barrett House, 39 George Street, Norwood, SA 5067 Australia with another psychiatrist named Helen Tingay who like Georgina Cheng is a danger to the general public. CHENG and TINGAY or any other are quite welcome to challenge my claims in a civil court where Australian law rules, not their sadistically psychopathic specialist brand of narcissistic Community Communism - unless, from my personal experience, you've got evident Labor political party supporters deciding your case; Judge Mark Griffin; Judge John Sulan; or Magistrate Alison Frances Adair.
SULAN in 2006 Adelaide Supreme Civil Court was the last of 3 judicial entities who in Supreme Court Appeal refused to look at my supporting evidence and ordered my residential eviction in 2006, the supreme court Registrar refused to accept my appeal from the Sulan appeal decision, on the grounds I didn't have a street address as I was homeless.
GRIFFIN in 2010 Adelaide District Civil Court refused to accept my Statement of Claim on my 2 May 2007 criminal assault at the hands of Christies Beach police by giving me the ultimatum either I sign a SOC authored by an anonymous person from the Christies Beach office next door to Labor Party’s John David HILL as my own creation or Griffin would toss my case from court. I refused to sign. Griffin tossed my case out.
ADAIR in 2019 Adelaide Magistrates Civil Court refused to acknowledge my national Consumer Law rights under Statute when she refused to hear my application for Summary Judgment even though the defendant failed to show in court and I had ample supporting evidence and defendant had ample time to respond. Adair insisted I must pay more court fees because I hadn’t asked the court for special leave to apply for summary judgment and interlocutory applications for Summary Judgment aren’t accepted in minor court because minor court doesn't have strict application of the Magistrate Court rules. Good luck if you can follow the logic of that.
There is only ONE Australian law and NOWHERE in Australian law does it say a person can be imprisoned for publishing TRUE FACTS, yet that's what Communist Georgina Ai Chin CHENG did with her band of lawless Communist styled State public officers from Noarlunga, Flinders and Adelaide AUSTRALIA after they repeatedly claimed my homelessness was due to mental illness; in their criminally falsified government records they illegally secreted from me (conspiracy to defame).
AUSTRALIAN COMMUNISTS have taken over government in Sydney, Canberra and Adelaide, reinventing Nazism; that's why AUSTRALIA SUX.
At the root of this is child to adult me refusing to remain silent in the face of atrocities against children. You'd be a fool to believe the churches were the only men involved in man-boy paedophilia last century. As the daughter of a Freemason I witnessed it many times as a child involving prominent government public officers, GPOs today are still covering it up as they scream for justice against the churches. Many people are happy to remain silent in exchange for government favours. You see the hate from Georgina Ai Chin Cheng when she spoke of the Internet to police officer #79819 as if it's a mortal sin, CHENG said, “Apparently, she has a habit of putting things on the Internet.” toward the end of video 'Second Confession' below (2:27m of 4:30m).
This is a true crime story about how state mental health law was criminally used by vexatious, sadistic psychopathic public officers, as a political weapon to ‘TOP DOWN’ circumvent Australian law and the individual's legal rights under statute.
Written by: Janette Gail FRANCIS (by birth) student-at-law HD grade in Defamation Law
December 2013 Adelaide AUSTRALIA:
A group of not too bright public officers in State health department decided they'd teach Janette a lesson for complaining about government conspiracies, so they discussed their conspiracy at length in group emails before Christmas in December 2013. Made their plan on paper on 15 January 2014. Then carried out the plan to the letter on 22 January 2014. Followed by the obligatory government cover-up that blamed their actions on an "order" issued by their boss "the Minister" the political head of their department.
Guess the Einstein’s never considered the probability that Janette might seek evidence of the Ministerial order in a Freedom of Information Act application. Naturally there was nothing to be found from the Minister.
For Communist CHENG's edification: Janette's Scottish-Irish copper brown curly sometimes fuzzy hair is only “dishevelled” to a Communist who adores their own lifeless straight black hair and wants it to be the new 'normal' - bit like brown eyed black haired Hitler and his blonde blue eye obsession.
Janette's personal philosophy is that 95% of government public officers have committed crimes that should put them in prison for a very long time, including the individuals whose documents appear on this page.
Certain conduct may not indicate mental illness A person does not have a mental illness merely because of any 1 or more of the following:
(a) the person expresses or refuses or fails to express, or has expressed or refused or failed to express, a particular political
opinion or belief;
(c) the person expresses or refuses or fails to express, or has expressed or refused or failed to express, a particular philosophy;
(e) the person engages in or refuses or fails to engage in, or has engaged in or refused or failed to engage in, a particular political activity;
(i) the person engages in or has engaged in illegal conduct;
(l) the person engages in or has engaged in anti-social behaviour;
(m) the person has a particular economic or social status or is a member of a particular cultural or racial group.
As used originally by the ancient Greeks, the term "philosophy" meant the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake, and comprised ALL areas of speculative thought, including the arts, sciences and religion. Philosophical questions (unlike those of the sciences) are usually foundational and abstract in nature. Philosophy is done primarily through reflection.
It appears from the documents that Andrew CHAMPION, Annette JONES, Georgina Ai Chin CHENG, Belinda MOYES and other inferred Communists decided Janette had a "philosophy" that disagreed with their personal philosophy as if they were followers of a Communist belief based system as loosely defined in following text:
Very broadly speaking, according to some commentators, Western society strives to find and prove "the truth", while Eastern society accepts the truth as given and is more interested in finding the balance. Westerners put more stock in individual rights; Easterners in social responsibility.
The illegality of their conspiracy is expressed in Mental Health Act 2009 (SA), s102 Offences relating to authorisations and orders which says:
s102(1) A medical practitioner or authorised mental health professional who signs any authorisation or order for the purposes of this Act, without having examined the person to whom the authorisation or order relates, is guilty of an offence. Maximum penalty: $25 000 or imprisonment for 2 years.
s102(5) A person who, by fraudulent means, procures or attempts to procure any person who does not have a mental illness to be received into a treatment centre, or to be treated as a person to whom an order applies under this Act, is guilty of an offence. Maximum penalty: $25 000 or imprisonment for 2 years.
As it turns out the South Australia Health Department 2014 Criminal Conspiracy includes the CEO of SA Health Belinda Moyes or one of her staff forging her signature had this to say:
"In accordance with the Mental Health Act 2009, you were placed under an Inpatient Treatment Order (ITO) for the purposes of a mental health assessment."
"During this admission you were diagnosed"
"Conspiracy whether civil or criminal traditionally has been defined as agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means A tortious conspiracy accordingly consists in the agreement of two or more persons to cause loss or damage to another by doing an ’unlawful’ act or by doing a lawful act by ’unlawful’ means Professor Howard’ has pointed out that ’as a matter of logic the first of these two categories of conspiracy includes the second. If there is an agreement to do an unlawful act there is a conspiracy. It is immaterial whether the act question is the ultimate object of the agreement or one of the steps along the way to that object. In either case the reason for calling the agreement a conspiracy is that it contemplates the performance of an unlawful act Recent Australian decisions nonetheless have affirmed the existence of two types of civil conspiracy."
Written in 1991
by Ellen Goodman LLM (Syd) BA (Macq)
Barrister, Supreme Court of NSW
Business Law Discipline
1991 Case Law:
Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd & Ors v Australian Federation of Air Pilots & Ors (1989) Aust Torts Reports 80 290.
BORN FOR PRISON
Adelaide government builds AUD$3 billion BRAIN research unit but has no doctors whatsoever capable of recognising non-biological items or life threatening infection in the brain or serious illness like schizophrenia - that's Communism Aussies Nazism's Style
"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it."
John Lennon (1940-1980)
What is 1998 US Patent ‘Voice to Skull’? The ‘psycho-electronic’ type of mind control I’m discussing here is the covert, around the clock harassment of innocent citizens living in their homes and communities, and is currently world wide in scope. This harassment includes electronic mind/body attacks, street harassment skits, destruction of family and other relationships and destruction of careers. Eleanor White:
RIGHT CLICK TO OPEN ANY IMAGE IN NEW TAB
ABOUT PDF LINK in HEADER ABOVE::
Even if I'm off the mark about the SHIELS, why would a specialist medical doctor in Australia respond from email and sent copy to another email – 2 email addresses that have NO relationship whatsoever to the email address that received the communication and why refuse a valid referral if she’s the “best” in Melbourne as she claims?
Even if you concede its acceptable for a medical doctor who must have compulsory insurance against medical negligence and keep exacting records is so blatantly careless about a diagnosis, and that's what the doctor had done - diagnosed me on the other specialist's documents and GP tests calling the GP and nerve conduction test specialists both liars by claiming I have no nerve damage. Its impossible to fake a 'nerve conduction test' its done electronically or electrically, like a multimeter measures current. Mine was only from the elbow to my hand, they can do ones from the shoulder but they refuse to do mine despite that moving my shoulder stops my entire arm from being numb.
The nerve injury is at my neck in both arms the evidence suggests surgical rape circa 1990 when I was about 33 years young - an Aussie born mother of 4 Aussie born sons running my own retail computer business; I was the editor of the Pontiac Car Club newsletter as we had family membership with the car club since Christmas 1987 when president Dave Clee (bit older than me) was said to have been an ex-Parramatta or Silverwater prison warden. We had 4 pontiacs (1929, 1937, 1948, 1969 Bonneville - history is always relevant.
GP discovered I have NO reflex whatsoever in BOTH knees and reduced reflex in one ankle and almost no feeling in my big toe to my ankle. She thought I was faking so I turned away as she thumped my knees.
Is this a fake response or is this experienced neuro specialist so certain the excess electrical activity I'm experiencing and the multiple leg / hip nerve pains are not from a 'normal' neurological source - then what is she saying? Is this her admission that she knows I'm a victim of Australian government illegal microwave accessing implants that's the source of all my woes for past 30 years so she refused to treat me on that basis?
Either way she's medically negligent or she's a fake. Australian governments PROMISE us world class medical care - exactly how does that fit in with how I've been treated? Doesn't matter if they all have irrefutable evidence or think I'm as nutty as a fruitcake, pursuant to Australian Consumer Law mandatory service guarantees - nutty or not we ALL have a legal right to “world class medical care” as advertised by the commonwealth health department; its a commonwealth statutory offence to insist any Australia has no right to protections under Australian Consumer Law. Which means its illegal.
Clearly I'm not a fruitcake - I fear for those who are and need this type of emergency medical care after criminal medical battery. I fear for the future of our planet at the hands of demented people with far too much power.
THIS WEBSITE REQUIRES LARGE MONITOR - NOT SUITABLE FOR MOBILE PHONE VIEWING. Definition of a Australian terrorist activity defined here.
You'd think an incidence of Misfeasance in Public Office would be picked up in Australia and corrected fast. Not so. In 2019 I'm STILL suffering the physical injuries (criminal surgical rape with vibrating implants) linked to the Misfeasance example on the right. Only way to get access to your legal rights in Australia is to SUE in CIVIL COURT, Australians in government HEALTH & POLICE are 100% proven criminal lowlife parasitic scumbags, lowest of the low.
Any person who comes to Australia to work as a medical doctor does NOT have the best interests of their patient as their first priority - best expressed by doctors who come to Australia from poverty stricken India, Malaysia or Africa, (but not limited to) they come here to get wealthy, many by any means. The evidence strongly suggests it was this type of immigrant who surgically raped me in NSW and this type of medical doctor who've refused to identify illegal implants ever since, which means EVERY doctor I’ve consulted since 1990, I’ve consulted an inordinately many Australian registered medical doctors since I knew I’d been surgically raped. Only reason I needed doctors was for (contraceptive) pill and to treat the effects of illegal implants and other criminal assaults or negligence of other people, when I complained to Labor party State government about being refused due process to diagnose illegal implants, the automatic reaction from this set of Communist Nazis was to accuse me of mental illness without any lawful due process whatsoever.
Michael (Mike) David Rann's ALP state government secretly (criminally illegally) diagnosed me as schizophrenic in 2007 “because I was suing politicians” that’s what they wrote but breached Australian law buy not telling me, I only discovered after change to Liberal party control in 2018 and from a Freedom of Information Act application, otherwise I’d never have known what that Australian government did in 2007 behind my back. However, that’s not as bad as being surgically raped under John Joseph Fahey’s Liberal government and Robert (Bob) John Carr’s Labor government in NSW, where I was born on 1st May 1956.
Remember what history (falsely) tells us happened to Maree Antionette after she said, “let them eat cake”? (circa 2003) I saw Bob Carr interviewed on NSW TV where he said the poor “can live OK on instant noodles” and not a squeak was heard ‘publicly’ in the news from the socialist left-wing Labor party or anyone for that matter. Bob Carr silently resigned “for family reasons” but was back a few years later.
This is how it works Bruce, (Lander) you may have your hierarchy of ‘status’ in your government jobs however it means nothing to me and indeed to any other reasonable person. We all come into and leave the world in exactly the same way, with nothing. In government, (like anywhere else) there are people paid to do a very specific job, some do a great job; unfortunately (often because they’ve built a network of on-the-job friendships) some do a poor job and some don’t do anything at all despite their job. Under Australian Consumer Law I can sue any lazy government person for not doing their job in the same way I can sue any other lazy person for not doing their job. That’s the way it’s been since the Kings laws started way back then and that’s precisely how it should be regardless of how important anyone thinks themselves to be. I filed a legally permissible interlocutory application with competent supporting Affidavit for summary judgment to dismiss the other party’s two-line defence, my application should have be heard on its merits, not simply brushed aside and refused any consideration whatsoever on political grounds which has no basis in Australian law. That's misfeasance isn't it Bruce?
Misfeasance (in public office) tort requires: (i) an invalid or unauthorised Act; (ii) done maliciously; (iii) by a public officer; (iv) in the purported discharge of his or her public duties; (v) which causes loss or damage to the plaintiff Northern Territory v Mengel (1995) Aust Torts Reports (81-335).
I say this to Georgina Ai-Chin CHENG & her bipartisan narcissist Communist comrades in government or elsewhere, named or inferred in this website: If you don’t like multicultural Australia where all can freely speak up against Communist practices of public officers like you; sue government & have proper diagnosis of illegal implants without automatically being diagnosed with mental illness as YOU DID TO ME then FUKOFF to Nth KOREA, RUSSIA or CHINA because UR not wanted anywhere else Arsewipes.
"Tyranny is a product of engaged followership predicated on identification with those in authority - whose cause is believed to be right, and that belief is the basis for followership"
These people appear as if they're aliens from another planet as they purposefully act with intent to undermine and destroy humanity one person at a time. They hunt in packs singling out their innocent victims for the express purpose of strengthening their own financial position, social status, or political career then these types of people are enemies of planet Earth and should be treated as such. Ask yourself when an alleged democratic government of people attack a person with no lawful excuse on political grounds; who are the terrorists?
When its medical crime, well that's as low as you can go.