Latin maxim “Quando aliquid prohibetur ex directo, prohibetur et per obliquum” means when something is prohibited directly, its prohibited indirectly.  Except in Australia where government public officers are largest organised crime network, they believe they're personally and individually above the law. Anticipating a long political career, parliamentarians became their unconstitutional accomplices in crime against Commonwealth enabling other public officers to cross the line from political policy into terrorism. Despite the illegality of their actions general news media silently support their government's terrorism in alleged democracies. That's something every person should be concerned about else one day we'll all be exactly like North Korea.   I don't mean ruled by man with bad haircut.

All that's needed to prove extensive AUSTRALIAN taxpayer funded TERRORISM is in the 7 links above.

unplug from the Matrix

Adelaide Magistrates Civil Court number ELCCI-19-6113 FRANCIS v The Trustee For Taylor Ramey Business Trust; trading as BUDGET LANDSCAPE AND BUILDING SUPPLIES; and Budget Bagged Products, ABN 63-152-425-120; alias Southern Landscapes Pty Ltd; alias Southern Landscape and Building Supplies.

Despite that I had no bill from Origin and Origin didn’t claim I owed them any money the State government regulator and State ombudsman all illegally REFUSED to step in, same as the arsewipe members of Adelaide’s State parliament including my Kaurna area State delegate, spinless John David HILL, close on their coat-tails were all Adelaide TV news stations and the Adelaide Advertiser. For 10 months in our State government rental we had no gas for cooking or hot water, which was significant as in the prior 2 years we were homeless sleeping and cooking from our family car unable to access showers unless we booked into a motel. My children were trying to complete their final years at school during that political criminal attack. We only got the gas back when I agreed to buy gas from Origin, then immediately switched to another provider; that was in 2009. Then noticed I had a gas leak in the meter that the male person sent by the supplier refused to acknowledge, the leak was in the meter (which was in my driveway near my front door when it was known I was a smoker.) I quit smoking and someone else fixed the gas leak. To me and any reasonable person that sounds like a conspiracy to murder me and my family with a gas explosion, intending to make it look like an accident. When that didn’t work, in 2011 & 2012 Onkaparinga council area doctors refused me antibiotic to treat obvious infection in my head. Evidently caused by the mystery item seen in MRI since 5 May 2006 that ADELAIDE region doctors also refused to see and all the other politically inclined Adelaide region zombies followed suit which is why this informative evidence based legally defamatory website exists. Legal defamation Ms WENHAM, because it’s the truth and its in context and it reasonably evalustes on all available & relevant evidence and I provide links etc to other relevent documents or websites and it concerns me personally and its in the public interest that I expose these ADELAIDE criminals.

7 August 2019 dated letter from the same Adelaide based State government of career criminals, trying to encourage me to switch back to Origin energy as part of a “South Australia Concession Energy Discount Offer.” Why does the State government need to get anyone to move to a specific provider? Why can’t they offer this through ALL providers? Isn’t that in breach of the constitution by a government offering favouritism to one retailer (Origin Energy) at the detriment of all others? It’s not Origin subsiding consumers, it’s the government subsiding Origin Energy. Looks like a red flag "danger Will Robinson" moment to me. Billy Mumy is around my age, loved this TV show as a kidling. 

Adelaide region people in authority appear to have been dropped on their head as babies causing long-term brain damage preventing them from understanding the actual rules of the community in which they live. I’m here to set them straight. I feel a bit like the man who shot Liberty Valance, without the chicky babe and the fear.

Above: Yes, I like to bullshit as much as the next person, I wasn't going to sue Woolworths, just wanted a proper response.  Can't say the same for Adelaide based State government though.

11 February 2019: “Jansie” the ACL expert at “Woolworths Customer Hub” ( emailed me to tell me if I had a problem with a phone, I bought I had to take it up with Alcatel the distributer, pretending not to know what a major failure is (ACL s260) deciding to side with staff to ignore federal law - The phone has its SIM card slot on the outside but that wasn’t stated on the box or in their store advertisement, if I’d known I wouldn’t have bought the phone (MAJOR FAILURE). Wrote to head office in Adelaide as initial staff and store manager at my local Seaford Rise Woolworths refused the refund on the same basis. In the end I taped up the box (which is what their staff do when they show customers the phones if they don’t have a demo) said nothing when I took it back to another store to get the refund which is my right under statute. It’s more than ‘just the government’ it’s the long-term community of people of ADELAIDE including police, they’re the ‘type’ of unscrupulous poor character individuals Australian Consumer Law (and its predecessors) were written to protect us good people from, the ‘type’ of poor character person in positions of authority who are so far up themselves they believe they are superior to federal law by excluding anyone who’s new to Adelaide or different from long-term Adelaide people or low in popularity with Adelaide people in authority. Stand up to them, they’re just low self-esteem bullies who run in packs because they couldn’t cope with life all on their own. Demand your consumer rights after all you wouldn’t put up with brats acting like those in Stephen King’s novel ‘Children of the Corn’ would you? These are no damn different. Put them in ‘their’ place.


April 2008 Origin Energy: Initially when I came to Adelaide in 2004 I thought is was just having a run of bad luck, wasn’t until Origin Energy that I started opening my eyes. Did you know the NSW State government sold Origin their energy retail company Integral? I didn't. Origin also bought another one from the Queensland government. It’s safe to say they kept some ex-government employees. Origin Energy was my electricity provider when I was zapped with a mystery blast of electrical energy to the back of my neck inside my house on 17 November 2005 and only after a mature male came to my door soliciting for Origin soon after I moved in a few weeks earlier. It was our first rental in Adelaide before that we were stuck in caravan parks. The electrical energy strike ended up causing us to be illegally evicted day after Anzac Day 2006 as the ex-Canberra ACT landlord and self-professed NSW movie producer (Peter Leovic) refused to get a repairer to look for an electrical fault. When I took vacant possession at my public housing current location in April 2008 Origin Energy had the gas already connected, I attempted to swap to several other providers but Origin illegally blocked that. Then despite NOT sending me any account for the small amount of gas I’d used, Origin Energy had me illegally disconnected from gas supply at my meter on my property.

THIS WEBSITE REQUIRES LARGE MONITOR - NOT SUITABLE FOR MOBILE PHONE VIEWING.                                    Definition of a Australian terrorist activity defined here.


because Adelaide State Courts won't protect you.


RIGHT: What the Commonwealth of Australia say about Australian Consumer Law (ACL); and below in stark opposites, read about public officers in the lowest civil court in Australia who believe they can make up their own laws to oppose federal law by insisting a wronged consumer (me) must surrender her consumer rights; (in breach of federal law) or be disgraced discredited and penalised in their courtroom and forced to pay fees a wronged consumer shouldn't have to pay to seek remedy for access to their rights by Consumer Guarantee. It's a classic example of politically organised government public officers deluded in their belief they ARE the law not merely the enforcers of Australian law.

Guess which government law will win?


NOTE: They too must ensure consumer guarantees for provision of services under the very same federal government Australian Consumer Law.


Goulburn, New South Wales, Local Court.


What came first, the chicken or the egg?


Circa 2004. State prosecutor for police approached me to introduce himself as Mr Winter then added that as he wasn't from around here he wasn't biased. Less than 30 minutes later he presented a photo to the court of the front windscreen of my 1998 Holden Calais, where in the corner of my windscreen was a small yellow rectangle sticker with black writing that read, “PROTECTED BY THE CLUB” the sticker had been provided free with my Club brand steering wheel lock. Adroit Mr Winter for the State of New South Wales told the magistrate that the sticker was proof that I was associated with outlaw motorcycle clubs. Magistrate Rabbage readily agreed with Mr Winter.


The case was a police application to the court for an Apprehended Violence Order against me to p[rotect an employee at state housing who had illegally broken into my state housing rental residence for the benefit of a member of her extended police family. Police applied for the order protecting the criminal in the equation because I'd complained about police corruption, in writing, to the police and that was the only claim made about my actions.


Children of the Corn Magistrate imposed a 5 year AVO on me to illegally attempt, gag me and prevent me from naming NSW Housing public officer, Ms Leisa Maree Bradbury, as the break and enter criminal; and her extended police family involving the Sydney police detective named as detective Bob Bradbury in the book “Brothers In Arms The Inside Story of Two Bikie Gangs.” Bob Bradbury also appears to be the person who stole the photo of my, (28 year old) face that was published in 1989 in the police book named, “Brothers In Arms The Inside Story of Two Bikie Gangs” as the face of a 14 year old murder victim and associated of outlaw bikers. Sydney defective detective Bob Bradbury lived near me at The Oaks NSW when the photo was stolen. His daughter was named Leisa, she had attended Chevalier College in Bowral NSW with my children.


What come first?


When I was a child I witnessed murder and rape of little boys, my own age, inside a FREEMASON temple in Campbelltown NSW. In those days, (1967) virtually all government public officers, including police, magistrates and lawyers were also FREEMASONS.


No person was eve charged for that murder and those rapes that I witnessed personally. I might add that I've also never been involved with outlaw motorcycle clubs, but I'll be damned if I'll go away quietly knowing this travesty of justice has occurred. That's why I've been made a victim of perpetuating GOVERNMENT crime.


Who could ever be afraid of cowardly pack rapists and child murderous? Not me. Who loves the actions of those 1960s child rapists and murderers? Every single current and past government public officer whose stood against me to pervert the course of justice in all these matters, that's who.


Time to rethink the 1966 disappearance of Beaumont children.

24 August 2018: BUDGET Landscape & Building Supply advertised BRIGHT WHITE stones on their own website, accompanied by a photo of stones all white in colour. I phoned to inquire if they were all white in colour, I was assured they were so I placed an order over the phone and paid cash on delivery.

29 August 2018: BUDGET stones delivered appeared to be all white bur were actually coated in a thick white coloured powder that washed off exposing yellow grey and black colours.

30 August 2018: Notified BUDGET by email of the fault the day after they delivered the stones. They refused to come onsite to look at the goods delivered indicates they KNEW there was a major fault with their consumer guarantee.

31 August 2018: BUDGET admit in email to the first major fault, being the colour difference. Dismissing it as normal for marble which is true but 100% irrelevant in reference to their advertisement of BRIGHT WHITE. I wouldn’t have bought the stones If I'd known BUDGET were passing off black, grey and yellow stones as white. The second fault is that BUDGET delivered a significant amount of rubble with my $305.50 order. No reasonable person expects to get a rubble chaser when they order stones. BUDGET refused to respond any further.

I’d spread a small amount of the stones however that’s irrelevant under Australian Consumer Law, the supplier must take the goods back if it’s a major fault despite any loss of packaging etc.

90% of the pile has been blocking my driveway for 12 months. It’s like a war, I’m hit every time I’ve attempt to socialise or participate in my community in any way, then the public officers claim my lack of community participation is evidence of mental illness - scum of the earth.

31 August 2018: I lodged BUDGET formal complaint with Adelaide’s State government Consumer and Business Services, but they refused to investigate paraphrasing verbally what John from BUDGET wrote in his email, being there can be colour variations when supplier advertises something is BRIGHT WHITE.

2018: I was studying Tort law at university when the stones were delivered as I had an existing defamation conspiracy issue to deal with in the specified 12 month limitation period that started in May 2018, an application by that 2 defendant’s to dismiss my claim for lack of evidence (SCCIV-19-400) was heard on 26 June 2019 but I’m still waiting for judgment on whether or not a foreign item in my head near my brain seen in MRI radiology is considered more important than the written diagnostic report that ignores it.

4 April 2019: Sent BUDGET a final notice they ignored. It’s mandatory pre court filing step and carries $20 fee payable to State magistrate’s court.

2 July 2019: Filed BUDGET civil claim in magistrates small claims, another $146 evidently it was to fund the State public officer Registrar to bully me for an hour in her attempt to get me to give in to her demand that I waiver my Consumer rights in breach of Australian Consumer Law, then put a black mark in the court file because I refused.

17 July 2019: Filed BUDGET application for Summary Judgment on the evidence on the grounds the defendant has no defence.

7 August 2019: BUDGET magistrate refused my Summary Judgment application against BUDGET ignoring my evidence, supporting the absent defendant’s claim they’d delivered what I ordered, and they’d offered me a refund. (BUDGET called it a refund but stipulated it wouldn’t be cash meaning they were only offering credit which is in breach of Australian Consumer Law). Magistrate ordered I pay another $220 for hearing in 10 weeks’ (22 October 2019) to give the, poor hard done by (sarcasm) defendant a chance to defend, my unreasonable (sarcasm) claim, despite that they could have on 7 August but couldn’t be bothered. Magistrate indicated I’d be disappointed on the final outcome if I refused to mediate with the supplier, then put her black mark against my name in the court file because I refused to mediate with the supplier on THEIR legislated offences pursuant to Australian consumer law.

I walk out of the court room and whose there to snarl at me gloating over his petty victory? The 5’ criminal who broke into my Mazda 929 circa 1997 to hide on the back floor from where he jumped up pointing a police issue pistol at me then chloroformed me before kidnapping me from out the back of Wollondilly Shire Council office in Picton NSW when I was Clr Jenny Hall. He should be on courts’ security video what’s a bet they can’t see him, or they say he’s someone else.

22 March 2006 - in comparison: in the very same minor Civil Adelaide Magistrates Court (file number AMCCI-06-1245) when I sued the ALP and Libs (Hall v Australian Labor Party and Liberal Party of Australia) the Magistrate accepted Summary Judgment application from the defendants ruling in their favour despite they'd no evidence to prove their case.

This outcome so far (minus the elderly criminal cop) establishes at the very least the irrefutable existence of an unlawful conspiracy, (tort law) between State public officer, you only need two for a conspiracy (agreement to act unlawfully) and under civil law you only need to establish the agreement occurred on the ‘balance of probability.

Another fuking abysmal government funded saga as evidence of the perpetuating ‘government public officer’ conspiracy to defame me as being just another an unreasonable crazy old bitch.

  • Schedule 2—The Australian Consumer Law

Part 4-1—Offences (relating to unfair practices see s36)

section 158, a person commits an offence if a person accepts payment for goods and at time of the acceptance the person intends to supply goods materially different from the goods the payment is accepted for. Strict liability applies which means supplier doesn’t get to mediate with the court to lesser their offence.


section 260, a major failure in goods occurs when reasonable consumer would not have purchased the item knowing the nature and extent of the failure, or the goods depart from description or demonstration model (which reasonably includes description or demonstration on supplier’s own website.)

section 261, if the consumer seeks refund for major fault, supplier must refund. (I paid cash they must refund in cash.)

section 263, if major fault and consumer can't return goods to supplier due to size or cost to return, then the supplier must collect the goods as ownership of goods passes back to supplier when consumer notifies supplier of the major fault. (which means I’m also able to seek rent or storage fees for the stones obstructing access in my driveway for past 12 months+.)

There's no justice under law only "due process of law" when government public officers deny you ‘due process’ then you have the right to sue their government (its stopped being YOUR government); if Australian officials act wilfully blind to the evidence by falsely claiming you don’t have the right to sue, then you get a hearing in the High Court where your access to ‘due process’ isn’t based on a secret popularity test.

ADELAIDE AUSTRALIA 7 August 2019: Despite that an application for Summary judgment saw no attendance from the defendant who also failed to submit any written response, the Adelaide Civil Court Magistrate ordered in favour of the invisible defendant failing (refusing by wilful blindness) to ‘inform themselves’ of the evidence being many documents with the Summary Judgment application affidavit and video @right. Evidently the plaintiff failed the magistrate’s secret (unlawful) popularity test, no doubt in relation to Janette creating this ‘legally informative’ website. I’m merely stating the FACTS the same way a newspaper of TV news program should.


BELOW LEFT: BUDGET say  I must surrender my consumer rights in breach of federal law.


BELOW RIGHT: Australian Consumer Law in Schedule 2, Competition And Consumer Act 2010 (Cth).

Janette's story is about an individuals rights to protection from crimes against humanity pursuant to **Australia's Criminal Code and other Australian law, verses a government's right to conceal past illegal medical procedures from the individual, by claiming political secrecy; or national interest; or greater good; or economic benefit; or medical research; or other privilege


  • In 2018 the new Liberal Party state government 'allowed' Janette partial copy of her alleged state mental health record created without legal excuse on 17 March 2006 by the Labor Party state government who had persistently refused to provide the record copy. There was no clinical data in the documents they provided. 100 pages were blacked grey A4 rectangles. All other pages were confirmation the Labor Party state government had been illegally stalking and harassing Janette and illegally gaining access o her personal information despite Australian law.

  • 10 were refused for “legal professional privilege”. (In medical records?)

  • 13 refused for containing “confidential material”.(They are Janette's medical record. Why would they be confidential FROM Janette? Under circumstance may identify the criminal sponsor of the already confirmed illegal implants defendants stubbornly refuse to acknowledge, despite the multiplicity of strong solid tangible evidence confirming that very real fact.) 6 refused for “personal affairs of a person living or dead”. (Which naturally includes Janette.)

  • 4 documents refused on “law enforcement” grounds. (Despite Janette wasn’t legally charged with a crime and police have refused to investigate these matters as crimes.)

  • 12 refused claiming they’re subjected to “secrecy”. (Under the circumstances either they identify to the criminal mastermind or they confirm Janette’s been forced to participate in illegal government human experiments in breach of Australia’s federal Criminal Code Australian law doesn’t allow “secrecy” in medical records from the patient, particularly a patient like Janette who is clearly of sound mind and clearly been illegally surgically assaulted and illegally identified as the face of a 1984 murder victim.)


** Australia's Criminal Code Act, Schedule 1, The Criminal Code, 268.13 Crime against humanity--torture;  268.20 Crime against humanity--persecution; 268.23 Crime against humanity--other inhumane act.

In life Keith Wilson was son and a NSW truck driver.

In death he's a symbol of hope for all Australians.


Fuller-Wilson v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWCA 218

Then deported if not born in Australia.


That's my opinion as an innocent victim of their insidiously cruel series of psychopathically criminally illegal human experiments for the past 30 something years.

The logic of people flocking to vocally oppose overseas human rights atrocities at the cost of failing to protect their own country's human rights, never ceases to amuse me. Australians act like they've been drugged through the water to be lulled into a false sense of security by politicians who say and promise only what the voting public want to hear, fully intending to metaphorically 'slit our throat' when an attractive financial opportunity arises.



I live about 9 kilometres from a hospital in a capitol city of Australia, but despite presenting with many serious injuries over the past decade or so, (2007 to 2019) the only medical service they've ever provided has been a criminally fabricated illegally enforced false imprisonment claimed valid under the state's Mental Health Act but all the Crown's men refused to intervene and facilitate my access to my legal entitlement to access life saving penicillin for visible infection in my left ear and left cheek.


In 2019 I can't drink the State government water that flows from the taps inside my State owned residential rental, because it smells and tastes like its been recycled from the sewer, since some time after State government installed underground purple recycled water pipes near my residence some years ago. I was never asked if I wanted recycled water for my garden.


Janette Gail FRANCIS

Attended Campbelltown NSW Australia government high school 1969 to 1972.

Children of the Corn

That South Australia, (SA) state health government public officers, (GPOs) identified Janette as; Janette HALL; and not Janette Francis from her Medicare record - indicates 2012 SA police told them Janette's last name was HALL and FRANCIS, (her birth name) therefore SA GPOs believed SA police over Janette's 'real' last name. That 2012 SA police used HALL instead of FRANCIS brings that matter back to 1989 when Sydney NSW Freemason police intentionally and falsely identified Janette's face as a 1984 murder victim so they could defame her as being a 'bikie moll' and 'friend of a paedophile' etcetera, those criminal conspirator Freemason police who were older than Janette, (she was 28 in 1984) were most probably dead or long retired from police service by 2012, therefore on balance of probability, the confusion over Janette's real last name arose amongst SA public officers who told Janette her NSW birth certificate, (for Janette Gail FRANCIS) belongs to someone else they probably think Janette is really Leanne Walters like a host of other GPOs in NSW did because criminal Freemason police, (like Sydney police defective detective Bob Bradbury Janette's residential neighbour in The Oaks NSW) told them so way back then see 'ears never lie'. Boom boom.

Dr CE Tildesley a 2011 Christies Beach SA medical doctor at 100 Beach Road told Janette, that her 'belief' she had been Clr Jenny Hall an elected member of NSW's Wollondilly Shire Council, (1995-1999) was a delusion requiring urgent psychiatric attention. Tildesley made sure she deleted some of the, (ABOVE) radiology letters from Christies Beach Medical Centre, (CBMC) record after Janette gave them to her to include in Janette's record at CBMC. We know who're the psychopaths are - we've proved its not Janette FRANCIS.

They shouldn't just be ignored or even simply banned for life ftom being medical doctors, they should spend 25 years in prison under national torture laws in Australia's Criminal Code Act, Schedule 1, The Criminal Code, thus;

  • 268.12 Crime against humanity--imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty; or
  • 268.13 Crime against humanity--torture;  or
  • 268.20 Crime against humanity--persecution; or
  • 268.23 Crime against humanity--other inhumane act.


Despite having no formal qualifications I am a scientist. I conduct mini experiments, intentionally to rule out the probability of something being true or false. One of my mini experiments resulted in my knowing an implant in my head is cochlear related. When I noted this to an Adelaide medical doctor he mocked me to his peers by saying I “believed” I had a cochlear implant which is evidenced by a large circular device you see attacked to the exterior of a person's head. The cochlear is not just an Australian government funded and researched implant to help some deaf people hear, the cochlear the NAME of a part of your ear. For the mocking doctor, that may prove he paid for his medical degree as opposed to earning it through knowledge.


Circa 1990 I saw a TV news program where a woman told of a new implant that made her voice hoarse, she added that when she didn't want the hoarseness all she had to do was put a magnet over part of the implant in her shoulder and the hoarseness in her voice stopped while the magnet was in place. So when I see a large MRI mass (5 May 2006) in my ear's cochlear region after feeling vibrations in my head around the same ear, vibrations that also make my throat quite hot and dry due to the friction of the vibration, (year 8 basic science) I experimented by putting a magnet over the cochlear region of that ear and hey-presto the vibrations I could feel and hear in my head stopped, after a little while I could feel the vibrations concentrated in my ear canal. To any scientist that's scientific evidence that I have an illegal cochlear implant in my left ear, probably funded under Australia's massive, (political) government funded cochlear implant research project that was also during the same period of time the cochlear implant was criminally inserted in my own cochlear without my knowledge and without my informed consent.


When you first learnt to comb your hair you may have noticed that, that friction can cause static electricity. For some of you that may have only been last week. What is dangerously interesting is that medical doctors have added to the long list of symptoms of MENTAL illness diagnosis, symptoms described by patients as "crawling" under their skin – which in reality is evidence of illegal implants being accessed by microwaves via mobile telephone towers - best demonstrated by the 5 May 2006 photo in Benson Radiology MRI of Janette's head that shows the bright lights on her nose (above or linked here) or circular shaped item that Janette feels moving under her skin and can be seen moving by others, (also above or linked HERE.) 


Gerard Leob is one of many foreign researchers who participated in the Australian cochlear research program, in Melbourne I believe, LEOB also trademarked an implant item titled a bionic neuron or BION as his Australian styled nickname and scientific evidence also suggests a high probability that I've also been criminally forced to be an unwilling host to many of LEOB's rather sadistic BION's, not one or two but many as seen in my candid photograph of my left foot emitting a glow from my foot as it painfully vibrated also with a strong pulse like the illegal implant in my left ear region of my head and also without my knowledge and without my informed consent. It may also be mere coincidence that Freemasons have a left-hand, handshake, but I doubt it.


They shouldn't just be ignored or even simply banned for life ftom being medical doctors, they shoild spend 25 years in prison under national torture laws in Australia's Criminal Code Act, Schedule 1, The Criminal Code, 268.13 Crime against humanity--torture. Then deported if not Australian born.

Recapping the relevant points; these 1980s and 1990s and 2000s criminally placed implants force Janette to suffer these effects of this organised Australian crime;

  1. debilitating paralysing pain due to the insertion of the implants against her spinal nerves; and

  2. resultant nerve death in her feet from the spinal attack; and

  3. damage to her internal structure causing hernias because the foreign items were illegally inserted; and

  4. the hernias themselves a major one between her chest cavity and her abdomen; and

  5. the natural reaction of her immune system coating these foreign items that now compress against her nerves, muscles, blood veins and her internal organs; and

  6. internal vibration at a level not natural inside a person; and

  7. abnormal heat generated from the friction of the vibration; and

  8. sparking generated from the friction of the vibration; and

  9. burns to her external skin from the microwaves sent from mobile phone towers to the criminally inserted implants; and

  10. debilitating paralysing pain due to tearing of internal skin tissue when the implant in her right knee moved in 2018; and

  11. disfiguring scars to her face caused by the insertion of illegal implants; and

  12. premature skin ageing caused by the abnormal drying damage to her skin from being low-level cooked by the microwaves; and

  13. damage to her scalp and body hair due to being exposed to abnormally high levels of microwave radiation; and

  14. perpetual nausea and headache due to all of the above; and

  15. multiple criminal defamations and false diagnoses from all levels of medical doctors keen to advance their career by participation in organised crimes partially funded by Australian Freemason and partially funded by criminally recalcitrant and recidivist government public officers wrongly in positions of power in our Australian government.

Only surgery I had as a child was in Canberra ACT Hospital to repair the puncture wound in my right eye and eyelid after I fell onto the sharp pruning of a chrysanthemum plant in 1960, (it never damaged my eyesight.) Because I was 4 they had to wash and dress me and knew I'd been sexually raped by my Freemason male parent, (3 March 1959) from the massive stitched tear scar I have that was only a few months old then but the bitch Matron told the nurses to remain silent. I can talk and write about it all objectively because I'm an a rare INTJ personality, and not because of any alleged mental illness as medical criminals in government might like others to believe for political reasons. The federal government owed me vicarious liability over the rape that occurred in a commonwealth building. The state government owed me a duty of care over the lack of police action in the matter despite knowing who the criminal offender was, moreover because they criminally harboured him 'because' he was a Freemason.


Only surgery I gave permission for as an adult was at Campbelltown NSW hospital under general anaesthetic to remove the last of my inexplicably rotting adult teeth in 1976; while awake under local anaesthetic in my then doctor's room at Argyle (cottage) Street Picton to cut an alleged cancerous mole allegedly growing over my spine at my bra strap level in 1991 when almost fiull term pregnant and where I now feel constant electrical spiking; at Camden NSW hospital under general anaesthetic to allegedly look for ulcers they said they were putting a camera in my stomach in 1996 and where I now feel constant vibrations and also sparking. I've woken other times in 1990s to discover unexplained puncture wounds all over.


Putting a large magnet against my diaphragm, (base of ribcage) causes the abnormal contractions of my diaphragm and the abnormal vibration in my stomach and spine at my bra strap area to cease. Its not rocket science, its surgical-rape. That, multiple medical doctors in Adelaide criminally conspire with government political entities elected into parliament, to falsely claim its in my imagination and reason enough to forcibly, (illegally) detain me under state Mental Health Act in 2014, on the, (illegal) instruction of a member in Adelaide State parliament, (in breach of the Act.) Can't help but wonder if there's a sarcastic reasoning behind calling Adelaide's brand new multi-million dollar medical research facility the Australian, 'Brag' centre.


The diaphragm vibrations also cause my throat and chin to vibrate resulting in painful irritation to my throat causing me to cough due only to the abnormal vibration in my throat caused by the illegal implants. All vibrations generate abnormal heat from the friction of the vibration its self, that's elementary science.


NB: the below SOC may change from time to time & does

 not necessarily accurately reflect a court filed document.

63 year old Janette (and probably many others) is being physically TORTURED every second of every day for the past couple of decades through illegal implants the PARTY faithful YOU financially support through the voting system refuse to let her have diagnosed and removed. 

Metaphorically we do live in 'the matrix' a fake reality.


This website contains irrefutable expert evidence prima facie criminal proof in hard tangible physical evidence of this extensive criminal cover up involving South Australia medical doctors and lawyers in concert with state government public officers over many decades.


Even a child knows that's wrong.

Milky Way over the Pinnacles in Australia - Image Credit, Michael Goh.